Ahhhhhhh. How can you talk about something without talking about it? It is somewhat of a predicament.
But the problem is with some stuff is that people getting outraged and talking about stuff gives the person who has done/said/planned the outrageous thing the publicity/attention they desired. So if I want to have a go at ‘you know who’ for his planned ‘you know what’ then if I mention him I am giving in to his small brain. [I have also realised the genius of this is that this can be applied to almost anyone in the business of publicity-seeking-self-serving agendas, and so this wont age. Unless this kind of cunty-ish behaviour dies out and people stop doing ridiculous shit. Or people stop paying attention to them. Apart from the fact no-one is reading anyway. Maybe I should threaten to **** some ***** on the anniversary of */** to get people to read my wretched bile.]
Having made the point that this could be applied to any similar events in the future, one might say I am going to contradict this somewhat by blaming the right-wing Christian fundamentalism of the protagonist in question. I would argue that this will cover about 50% of people doing likewise in the future. The other side are the people diametrically opposed to these, as ever it is the extremes that seek/gain all the attention and get on the news etc when by being either extreme they are already predefined as being a cock.
Anyway, I am not contradicting myself. You are.
And I am not going to blame the Christianity element of these madholes anyway, if you thought I was. I saw someone comment earlier in the week that ‘people asking what would Jesus do are mental’. Why exactly? Other than him being a fictional character. I’d suggest the one thing you couldn’t attack about Christianity was Jesus. And I’m not having a go at the Jews there, let sleeping dogs lie. The problem with these redneck Christians is them, not Jesus. Not to attack the philosophy of a man who was seemingly about love and acceptance. And mending flaky skin.
If I am being honest, I just really hated the woman who made the statement. She was an evil, thick cunt who used to work where I work (See I don’t behave like Jesus, but would you given what happened to him?). The point is living life like Jesus wouldn’t be that bad. But they don’t live like Jesus do they? They live like Hitler if anything. Who did burn books as well. And it’s the behaviour of the people you should judge, not the belief system they attach themselves to.
Here endeth the sermon.
Bad ad?
While I am at it, and I don’t want to detract or compare Stonewall to the people I am lambasting here, I meant to write something about this poster that Stonewall used recently. And lets be clear on one thing: I am not a homophobic, not in the slightest. I just thought this poster was a bit naff. I’m not sure who a poster like this is meant to appeal to anyway, I mean we (and I mean, like intelligent 21st century people) know that we are all equal and others shouldn’t be judged by where they put their cock (or fanny). So…this poster isn’t aimed at us – right? So if it is aimed at the people who are – and lets use the word backwards here, and use it in a judgmental sneering way – backwards and think homosexuals/bi-sexuals/etc are wrong, or bad or anything other than the same as us. Is this really going to convince anyone of that mindset of anything? I mean can you imagine some guy sat there who hates the thought of a homosexual looking at this and thinking “Wow, being told to get over it in a (slightly camp)way has certainly changed my tune.” No, neither can I. I think my point is, it’s a bad advert. The people who need to be educated cannot be won over in a media-friendly sound-bite.
Stonewall: some of your posters are shit. Get over it!
